Research Scotland logo
View Item 
  •   Research Scotland Home
  • Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland (BioSS)
  • Journals
  • View Item
  •   Research Scotland Home
  • Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland (BioSS)
  • Journals
  • View Item
  •   Research Scotland Home
  • Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland (BioSS)
  • Journals
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Considering appropriate replication in the design of animal social network studies

Thumbnail
Date
10/05/2019
Author
Smith, L.A.
Swain, D.L.
Innocent, G.T.
Nevison, I.M.
Hutchings, M.R.
Publisher
Springer Nature
Version
2018-08-16
2018-08-16
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Social network analysis has increasingly been considered a useful tool to interpret the complexity of animal social relationships. However, group composition can affect the contact structure of the network resulting in heterogenic variation at the group level. Replication in contact network studies is rare but is essential for valid hypothesis testing and inference in social contact networks. Social contact data were collected from replicated networks of cattle before and after the application of a social disturbance treatment and the impact of varying the number of replicates in the study was investigated. Subtle but consistent changes in animal contact patterns were detected after the application of a social disturbance treatment demonstrating that replicated animal contact networks are a sensitive tool to investigate biological effects in animal social systems. The analysis demonstrates that reducing the number of networks observed in the study would reduce the probability of detecting treatment differences for social behaviours and social network measures even if the total number of animals was kept the same. This is the first study to quantify within- and between-group variation in animal social contact behaviour, assess its impact on the precision of treatment differences, and consider the likely implications for hypothesis testing.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43764-9
Link
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12594/10104
Citation
Scientific Reports, 9, 7208
Collections
  • Journals [121]
©Research Scotland Consortium
c/o RGBE 20a Inverleith Row
EH3 5LR
Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Tel: 0131 248 2850
Email: info@ResearchScotland.ac.uk
Items in Research Scotland are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • Takedown Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Policies
  • Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Policies
Contact
 
Advanced Search

Browse

All of Research ScotlandPartners & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublishersThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublishers

My Account

LoginRegister
©Research Scotland Consortium
c/o RGBE 20a Inverleith Row
EH3 5LR
Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Tel: 0131 248 2850
Email: info@ResearchScotland.ac.uk
Items in Research Scotland are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • Takedown Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Policies
  • Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Policies
Contact